R&D Tax Incentive Example – Black Box Flight Recorder

Developing the next ‘black box’?

Let’s discuss your R&D benefits.

Call 1300 658 508



Ever felt a tad overwhelmed thinking about writing an R&D application?
Trust me, you’re not alone. It can seem daunting, but here’s a way to make sense of it all.
Let’s hop into a time capsule and revisit the development of the aviation game-changer – the black box flight recorder.
Using this classic example, I’ll unravel the R&D application, hurdles encountered, and the innovative sparks that took flight.
By journey’s end, you’ll have a more grounded understanding of how R&D tax incentives application might align to your project.

The Black Box Flight Recorder

Understanding the R&D tax incentive becomes a lot clearer when we examine it through the lens of a tangible example. The black box flight recorder, an innovation in aviation safety, serves as the perfect case study. Beyond its life-saving functionalities lies a narrative of intricate research, challenges, and revolutionary development.

This R&D tax incentive example offers insights into the processes and hurdles of pioneering such a transformative product. It also highlights how the R&D tax incentive would have played a crucial role in supporting and propelling this invention forward.

Let’s delve deeper into the story of the black box flight recorder, appreciating its technical challenges and triumphs, all while understanding its potential interaction with the R&D tax incentive.



Commercial Objectives

The Aeronautical Research Laboratory (ARL) stands behind the pioneering development of the black box flight recorder technology.
Our primary innovation is designed to record crucial flight data and cockpit voice interactions, serving as a pivotal tool in deciphering the mysteries of aviation accidents.
The core clientele for this revolutionary product spans commercial airlines and aircraft manufacturers. Moreover, aviation regulatory bodies and investigative agencies have expressed significant interest due to the device’s potential to enhance aviation safety standards and practices.

Unlock the full potential of your R&D tax claims with Bulletpoint. 

Book a meeting today    

R&D Tax Incentive

R&D objective

In the past year, the Aeronautical Research Laboratory (ARL) set its sights on advancing the technical features of the black box flight recorder. The essence of our focus was to elevate its recording precision, enhance data retrieval processes, and improve its resilience under extreme conditions.

Our project can be succinctly summarised as the endeavour to redefine the standards of flight data recording by addressing current technical limitations.

Our central hypotheses and goals for this project were:

  • To develop a recorder that can capture high-resolution data, thus providing a more detailed insight into the flight dynamics and cockpit interactions.
  • To improve the speed and reliability of data extraction processes from the device, ensuring swift and accurate investigations.
  • To enhance the recorder’s structural integrity, making it more resistant to the physical damages typically sustained during aviation mishaps.

Specific Technical Objectives

Our detailed technical objectives aimed to address the nuanced challenges of flight recording.

Specifically, we sought to develop:

  1. A multi-channel recording system that can simultaneously capture various flight parameters, increasing the breadth and depth of data collected during each flight.
  2. An advanced data compression algorithm that ensures large volumes of information are stored efficiently without compromising the integrity or quality of the data.
  3. A robust outer casing for the recorder, fabricated with materials that can withstand high-impact forces and extreme temperatures, ensuring data preservation even in catastrophic events.
  4. An intuitive interface for data retrieval that streamlines the extraction process, making it user-friendly for investigative authorities.
  5. A fail-safe power backup mechanism that ensures continuous recording even when the primary power sources in an aircraft are compromised.

Existing Knowledge

In the field of aviation safety, the value of flight data for post-incident analysis was widely recognised.

At the time, there were rudimentary flight data recording systems in place which captured basic flight parameters.

These devices helped investigators piece together sequences leading to incidents but had significant limitations:

  • Limited Data Channels – Older recording systems captured only basic parameters like altitude, speed, and heading. The depth of information was not comprehensive.
  • Vulnerability Existing flight recorders lacked the durability to withstand severe crash impacts and high-temperature fires, often leading to loss of crucial data.
  • Data Retrieval – Extracting data from these devices was a complex and time-consuming process, delaying investigations.

However, what wasn’t known or developed at this juncture was:

  • How to efficiently record and store multiple channels of data, including voice recordings from the cockpit.
  • Creating a recorder that could reliably survive and protect its data against the intense conditions of a severe crash.
  • Designing a device that allowed swift and straightforward data retrieval without compromising the quality of the stored information.

Given this backdrop of existing knowledge, the development of the Black Box Flight Recorder was initiated, seeking to bridge these gaps and revolutionise the domain of flight safety and accident investigations.

Your innovation could be the new ‘black box’.

Talk with us about R&D tax breaks on 1300 658 508.

R&D Tax Incentive


Knowledge Gaps

The major knowledge gaps at the onset of the Black Box Flight Recorder’s development included:

  • Designing a durable storage medium that could reliably safeguard data even in extreme crash conditions, resisting both high-impact forces and intense fires; and
  • Developing efficient algorithms or methods to simultaneously capture, compress, and store multiple channels of high-fidelity data, including real-time cockpit conversations, without any significant loss in data quality.

Key Competitors

The industry competitors at the time of the Black Box Flight Recorder’s development included:

  • AeroData Systems
  • AvioTech International

While these companies theoretically might have had the capabilities to reproduce certain aspects of the work undertaken by Aeronautical Research Laboratory, specific details and breakthroughs were proprietary, ensuring a competitive edge for the Black Box’s unique design and functionalities.

New Knowledge

New knowledge is expected to be generated in the following areas, directly stemming from our project’s hypotheses:

Experiment 1 – How to ensure data integrity during extreme conditions

Building on our hypothesis about maintaining data integrity amidst crash impacts and fires, we aim to:

  • Identify the optimal materials that resist extreme temperatures and pressures without compromising data storage.
  • Develop a mechanism that ensures uninterrupted power supply even during electrical failures.
  • The closest solution to this would be traditional metallic casings, but they often compromise on weight and may not guarantee data protection against intense fires.
  • Identify the optimal materials that resist extreme temperatures and pressures without compromising data storage.
  • Develop a mechanism that ensures uninterrupted power supply even during electrical failures.
  • The closest solution to this would be traditional metallic casings, but they often compromise on weight and may not guarantee data protection against intense fires.

Experiment 2 – How to minimise data retrieval time after a crash

Based on our hypothesis about swift post-incident analysis, our objectives are to:

  • Establish a methodology to rapidly access stored data without physical interference with the recorder.
  • Prototype an external interface or wireless transmission mode, ensuring data can be pulled swiftly without needing to locate the physical box immediately.
  • The closest existing solution is manual retrieval and analysis, which can be time-consuming and delays crucial investigative processes.

Experiment 3 – Improving audio clarity in high-noise environments

One challenge with cockpit voice recorders is the interference from ambient noise, especially during emergencies.

Based on our hypothesis that filtering out non-essential sounds can improve investigative clarity:

  • Evaluate various noise-cancellation algorithms to discern human voices clearly from background noise.
  • Identify hardware improvements, possibly multi-directional microphones, that can isolate pilot and co-pilot voices effectively.
  • The closest existing solution involves simple noise reduction, which can sometimes filter out crucial auditory information.

Experiment 4 – Enhancing data storage redundancy

Ensuring that no single point of failure exists is crucial.

Building on our hypothesis about creating multiple fail-safes:

  • Investigate novel storage techniques that duplicate data across different sections of the device.
  • Develop a mechanism where, upon detecting a potential fault or damage, the system reroutes data to undamaged storage units.
  • Presently, most systems use a singular storage method, making them vulnerable to data loss in case of damage to that section.

Experiment 5 – Real-time data transmission during emergencies

If we could relay crucial data just moments before an accident, it might provide invaluable insights.

Stemming from our hypothesis that real-time transmission can be both feasible and invaluable:

  • Explore robust transmission protocols that can send data packages even under intense conditions like sudden altitude drops or sharp turns.
  • Design an “emergency mode” trigger, possibly based on flight parameters, to start the data relay without manual intervention.
  • The nearest solution today involves periodic data transmission, but not an intensive, emergency-focused relay.

Pushing boundaries like the black box?

Discover how we can assist with R&D incentives.

Phone 1300 658 508.

R&D Tax Incentive

Pre-identified Challenges

The challenges that were anticipated before embarking on this project include:

  • Data Integrity in Adverse Conditions: Given the volatile environments in which aircrafts operate, maintaining data integrity during turbulence, rapid altitude changes, or in the event of technical malfunctions posed a significant challenge.
  • Energy Efficiency and Conservation: The recorder needs to function even when the aircraft’s main power systems fail. Designing an energy-efficient system that can operate under these constraints without depleting the backup power was another pre-identified challenge.

Unknown Outcomes

As the project progressed, several unforeseen challenges emerged:

  • Heat Resistance of Storage Materials: The materials initially chosen for data storage were not as heat-resistant as anticipated, especially in prolonged high-temperature conditions, leading to potential data loss.
  • Interference from Other Onboard Systems: Unpredicted electromagnetic interference from other onboard systems occasionally disrupted the recorder’s operations, challenging our understanding of its isolation requirements.
  • Material Wear and Tear: The wear and tear on the black box’s outer casing were more pronounced than expected, particularly when exposed to moisture and saline conditions, prompting a review of material choices.

See how your tech marvel can secure R&D tax rewards. 

Schedule a chat with Bulletpoint.

R&D Tax Incentive


Experiment 1 – How to ensure data integrity during extreme conditions


In the early development stages of the black box flight recorder, one of the primary challenges was ensuring that the device could reliably record and store critical flight data, even under the extreme conditions of an aviation accident, such as fire, water immersion, and significant impacts.


The hypothesis of the experiment is that the flight recorder’s storage medium will:

  • Resist high-temperature exposures up to 1000°C for short durations;
  • Remain waterproof even when submerged at depths of up to 6,000 meters; and
  • Withstand impact shocks up to 3,400 G’s (where G is the force of gravity).

It is determined this may be achievable due to:

  • Advanced material research suggesting that certain alloys and composites can offer high-temperature resistance;
  • Preliminary tests showing that certain sealing materials can provide waterproofing at significant depths; and
  • Prior knowledge from automotive industry crash tests, indicating potential shock resistance materials and design structures.

To test the hypothesis, a prototype of the flight recorder was constructed using the selected materials.

It was then subjected to a series of controlled tests:

  1. High-Temperature Test: The recorder was placed in a furnace with temperatures up to 1000°C for specific durations to assess its heat resistance.
  2. Deepwater Immersion Test: The device was submerged to depths of 6,000 meters using a pressure chamber to simulate the pressures of deep-sea conditions.
  3. Impact Shock Test: Using a drop test platform, the recorder was subjected to shocks corresponding to 3,400 G’s to test its resistance to abrupt impacts.

Experimental Activities 

The experimentation involved:

  • Testing the flight recorder’s storage medium to determine its ability to resist high temperatures and maintain data integrity.
  • Integration trials involving the connection of the storage medium with the device’s outer casing to ensure total waterproofing.
  • Conducting impact assessments on the recorder’s exterior to understand its durability during sudden forceful events.

The experimental activities considered:

  • Efficiency of data retrieval after each test.
  • Performance under extreme conditions (heat, water pressure, and impact).
  • Process by which the device functions and saves data during these tests.
  • How each feature, such as real-time data transmission or storage capacity, performs under stress.

The flight recorder system was trialled both in a controlled workshop environment for initial tests and in simulated field conditions to mimic real-world scenarios.

Revolutionary like the black box?

Learn about your R&D tax benefits with Bulletpoint.

R&D Tax Incentive



The initial results and observations of the experiment were:
  • The flight recorder’s storage medium effectively resisted temperatures up to 600°C without data corruption.
  • During the integration trials, the outer casing maintained a watertight seal, ensuring that data remained uncompromised even when submerged.
  • Under impact assessments, while the exterior showed minor dents, the integrity of the device remained intact, and no data loss occurred.


Some of the technical complexities of this experiment that were overcome or addressed:

  • Ensuring the flight recorder’s storage medium could resist high temperatures without data corruption.
  • Ensuring that the outer casing maintained a watertight seal in varying conditions.
  • Assessing the device’s resilience to impacts without compromising data integrity.

Was the hypothesis supported?

Which components were supported, required further support:

  • The hypothesis that the flight recorder’s storage medium could resist high temperatures was supported.
  • The hypothesis about the watertight seal was supported during the initial tests, but further rigorous underwater pressure tests are recommended.
  • The impact assessments supported the hypothesis about the recorder’s resilience to impacts, but further tests in varied real-world scenarios may be required.

Revision of hypothesis going forward: Considering the results, future iterations of the hypothesis should explore the recorder’s ability to resist higher underwater pressures and test its durability under prolonged exposure to extreme conditions.

Black box-level innovations deserve R&D tax benefits.

Start your journey with Bulletpoint by dialling 1300 658 508.

R&D Tax Incentive

New Knowledge Generated 

The core activity was primarily aimed at producing new knowledge about the robustness, resilience, and reliability of a flight recorder device in extreme conditions, which existing devices hadn’t encountered or adequately addressed.

This knowledge generation leaps off from the understanding that while flight recorders of the era were designed to survive accidents, the intensity of real-world conditions (like fiery crashes, deep-sea pressures, or long durations of extreme temperatures) could compromise their data integrity. Our exploration sought to push the boundaries of what a flight recorder could withstand, ensuring that data retrieval was possible even in the most challenging conditions. This was vital, as each piece of data can be crucial in accident investigations, helping to improve the safety of future flights.

The outcome was deemed unknown in advance due to:

  • The limited empirical evidence available on how different materials would respond to the high impact, fire, and deep-sea pressures, meaning our proposed solutions could have been ineffective.
  • The uncertainty around ensuring uninterrupted data transmission amidst extreme conditions.

Sources cited and knowledge engaged to confirm this conclusion:

  • Research articles on material science from academic journals, pinpointing the lack of comprehensive studies on materials for flight recorder usage.
  • Discussions and forums from aviation technical communities highlighting the challenges of real-time data transmission in compromised environments.

Supporting Activity 1 – Material Testing for Durability


To identify the most resilient materials that can safeguard the data within the flight recorder against extreme conditions such as fire, high impact, and deep-sea pressures.


  • Isolation of potential materials based on initial research.
  • Conduction of controlled experiments subjecting materials to extreme conditions.
  • Analysis of material performance post-exposure to assess integrity and durability.


Discovery of a composite material blend that showcased significant resistance to identified extreme conditions, forming the primary casing for the black box.

Supporting Activity 2 – Data Storage and Retrieval Mechanisms


To design a robust data storage mechanism within the flight recorder that ensures data integrity even after extreme trauma.


  • Exploration of existing data storage mechanisms and their limitations in challenging environments.
  • Prototyping of potential storage designs followed by controlled stress tests.
  • Feedback incorporation and iterative design improvements based on test results.


Development of a unique multi-layered storage system, ensuring redundancy and minimising data loss, even if one layer becomes compromised.

Black box-level innovations deserve R&D tax benefits.

Start your journey with Bulletpoint 1300 658 508.

R&D Tax Incentive


Here is a list of substantiation provided:

  • Literature Review on Flight Recorder Limitations: A comprehensive document detailing the known limitations and inefficiencies of current flight recorder systems. This review would provide context for the need for an advanced recorder and set the stage for the innovative work undertaken in Core Activity 1.
  • Detailed Lab Notes: These notes chronicle the series of tests conducted for real-time data transmission, capturing not only the results but the methodology, equipment settings, environmental conditions, and any anomalies observed during the experimentation phase.
  • Comparative Test Results: A thorough document comparing the performance of the new black box technology against its predecessors. This comparison showcases the improvements in data transmission rates, storage efficiency, and error reductions achieved through the R&D efforts of Core Activity 1.
  • Circuit Schematics of the New Black Box: Detailed engineering diagrams that outline the design and layout of the device’s internal circuitry, highlighting the innovations and enhancements made to support the real-time data transmission and advanced analytics features.
  • Feedback Forms from Pilot Tests: Compiled feedback from initial real-world tests conducted in controlled flight environments. These forms capture pilot and crew observations, data inconsistencies, and potential areas of improvem

Navigating the R&D Landscape with Bulletpoint

The journey of innovation isn’t just about groundbreaking developments like the black box flight recorder. It’s also about ensuring that these innovations are recognised and rewarded aptly through R&D tax incentives.

At Bulletpoint, our track record speaks volumes. With over a decade of experience, 500+ successful applications, and an impeccable reputation backed by 250+ Google reviews, we are the trusted partner you need to guide you through the intricacies of R&D tax incentive claims. Your engineers and developers focus on the next big thing; let us handle the complex world of R&D tax incentives.

You’ve pushed the boundaries of innovation. Now, ensure you’re adequately rewarded for it.

Book a meetingsend us a message, or directly call on 1300 658 508 to start your journey with Australia’s leading R&D consultants.


Before anyone starts rewriting history or dialling their aviation aficionados, let’s set the record straight.

The black box flight recorder didn’t fetch any R&D rebates.

Shocking, we know! Nor did we, with our modern-day wizardry, travel back in time to assist them.

The R&D rebate program? Wasn’t even a twinkle in anyone’s eye back then.

What you’ve read is a delightful mishmash of imagination and illustrative creativity.

Let’s just say, if there were a Nobel Prize for Historical Fiction in R&D Rebates, we might be contenders.

Do remember, no actual IP was harmed (or used) in the crafting of this tale, and we are in no way affiliated with the legendary black box.

So, enjoy the story, take it with a pinch of salt, and remember to laugh a little. After all, isn’t that what hypotheticals are all about?


Frequently Asked Questions

Core R&D activities are the primary experimental activities undertaken to achieve new knowledge, focusing directly on resolving specific scientific or technological challenges.

Supporting R&D activities are tasks that directly support your core R&D activities. Describe their relevance and how they contribute to the primary experimental process.

An experiment is a systematic approach where you formulate a hypothesis, conduct tests, and analyse results to draw conclusions, ultimately gaining new knowledge.

An experiment should have a clear hypothesis, a method detailing the procedures, a recording process for results, and an evaluation phase leading to conclusions.

Evaluation involves analysing the collected data, comparing it against the initial hypothesis, and drawing conclusions based on empirical evidence.

A conclusion should summarise the findings, state whether the hypothesis was supported, detail any new knowledge gained, and suggest future research directions.

New knowledge refers to insights, understandings, or discoveries that extend the boundaries of what is already known in a particular field.

An unknown outcome implies that the result of the experiment could not have been predicted based on existing knowledge or expertise in the field.

It refers to the known scientific or technical obstacles at the onset of the project, which the R&D activities aim to address.

Knowledge gaps are areas or topics within a field where the existing information is insufficient, leading to the need for further research.

A competent professional is someone with the expertise and qualifications in a specific field who can assess whether a claimed activity is genuinely experimental.

Existing knowledge encompasses all the known information, data, or findings within a specific field before the commencement of a new R&D project.

A technical objective is a clear, detailed goal related to the technological or scientific aspect of a project, focusing on the expected advancements or results.

An R&D tax incentive example typically showcases a specific project or experiment, detailing its hypothesis, methods, results, and conclusions, providing clarity on how to approach the incentive application.

While core activities revolve around the primary experimental tasks directly contributing to new knowledge, supporting activities are secondary tasks that aid and back the core ones but may not lead to new insights on their own.

Documentation should be comprehensive, capturing all aspects of the R&D process, from the initial hypothesis to the conclusions, ensuring clarity and substantiation for every claim made.

The ‘new knowledge’ criterion ensures that the R&D activity extends beyond current understandings, making it genuinely innovative and thus eligible for the tax incentive.

Familiarize yourself with the latest guidelines, consider professional consultation, and ensure your application clearly articulates the experimental nature of your activities, demonstrating the pursuit of new knowledge.

While there’s no set frequency, guidelines may be updated in response to changes in legislation, emerging industries, or to provide clearer direction for applicants. Regularly checking the official website or consulting with experts can keep you updated.

Differentiating helps in justifying the R&D claim by providing a clear picture of the primary experimental tasks and their complementary activities, ensuring that all claimed tasks are genuinely relevant to the R&D process.

What is the #1 grant for start-ups?

12,000+ companies access the R&D tax incentive per year that yields a CASH REBATE of up to 43.5%.
This might be perfect your start up.
Do you want to know more?

Scroll to Top
R&D Top 10 Consultant Tips

Top 10 Consultant Tips to Maximise the R&D Tax Incentive